![]()
Documentation Power Tools
25 years experience in long term care |
|
|
|
Home Guidance to Surveyors of Long Term Care Facilities F520, (Rev. XX), §483.75(o) Quality Assessment and Assurance Advance Copy (1)A facility must maintain a quality assessment and assurance committee consisting of – (i)The director of nursing services; (ii) A physician designated by the facility; and (iii)At least 3 other members of the facility’s staff. (2) The quality assessment and assurance committee – (i)Meets at least quarterly to identify issues with respect to which quality assessment and assurance activities are necessary; and (ii)Develops and implements appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies. (3) State or the Secretary may not require disclosure of the records of such committee except insofar as such disclosure is related to the compliance of such committee with the requirements of this section. (4) Good faith attempts by the committee to identify and correct quality deficiencies will not be used as a basis for sanctions. INTENT: 483.75(o) Quality Assurance and Assessment The intent of this requirement is that: · The facility has an ongoing quality assessment and assurance (QAA) committee that includes designated key members and that meets at least quarterly; and · The committee identifies quality deficiencies and develops and implements plans of action to correct these quality deficiencies, including monitoring the effect of implemented changes and making needed revisions to the action plans. Overview QAA is a management process that is ongoing, multi-level, and facility-wide. It encompasses all managerial, administrative, clinical, and environmental services, as well as the performance of outside (contracted or arranged) providers and suppliers of care and services. Its purpose is continuous evaluation of facility systems with the objectives of:
The guidance below includes sections that describe facility responsibilities to meet the various aspects of the QAA requirement, including:
QAA COMMITTEE FUNCTIONS Key aspects of the QAA requirements include the specifications that the facility must have a QAA committee, that this committee must include certain staff members, and that the committee must meet at least quarterly. The QAA committee is responsible for identifying whether quality deficiencies are present (potential or actual deviations from appropriate care processes or facility procedures) that require action. If there are quality deficiencies, the committee is responsible for developing plans of action to correct them and for monitoring the effect of these corrections. These functions of the QAA committee are described below. Committee Composition and Frequency of Meetings The regulation states that the QAA committee must include the director of nursing, a physician, and three other staff. These additional members may include:
Meetings of the QAA committee must be held at least quarterly or more often as the facility deems necessary to fulfill committee functions and operate effectively. The Committee should maintain a record of the dates of all meetings and the names/titles of those attending each meeting. Identification of Quality Deficiencies Facilities can collect and analyze data about their performance from various sources that may help them to identify quality deficiencies. These may include information from reports such as open and closed record audits, facility logs and tracking forms, incident reports, consultants’ reports, and other reports as part of the QAA function. Quality deficiencies related to facility operations and practices are not only related to those that cause negative outcomes, but also may be directed toward enhancing quality of care and quality of life for residents. The committee responds to quality deficiencies and serves a preventative function by reviewing and improving systems. Records of the committee meetings identifying quality deficiencies, by statute, may not be reviewed by surveyors unless the facility chooses to provide them. However, the documents the committee used to determine quality deficiencies are subject to review by the surveyors. NOTE: A State or the Secretary may not require disclosure of the records of the QAA committee except insofar as such disclosure is related to the compliance of the QAA committee with the regulations. If concerns, especially repeat survey deficiencies, have not been identified by the facility’s QAA committee, this may be an indication that the committee is not performing the functions required by this regulation. Development of Action PlansIn order to fulfill the regulatory mandate, the facility’s QAA committee, having identified the root causes which led to their confirmed quality deficiencies, must develop appropriate corrective plans of action. Action plans may include, but are not limited to, the development or revision of clinical protocols based on current standards of practice, revision of policies and procedures, training for staff concerning changes, plans to purchase or repair equipment and/or improve the physical plant, and standards for evaluating staff performance. Implementation of Action Plans and Correction of Identified Quality DeficienciesThe facility’s action plans to address quality deficiencies may be implemented in a variety of ways, including: staff training and deployment of changes to procedures; monitoring and feedback mechanisms; and processes to revise plans that are not achieving or sustaining desired outcomes. The committee may delegate the implementation of action plans to various facility staff and/or outside consultants. INVESTIGATIVE PROTOCOL QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND ASSURANCE Procedures During Offsite Survey Preparation (see Appendix P, Task 1), the survey team must review information about the facility prior to the survey. Sources include, at a minimum: · Quality Measure/Quality Indicator Reports; · The OSCAR 3 Report (includes a 4-year history of the facility’s deficiencies from standard surveys, revisits, and complaint surveys). The survey team should determine if the facility has had repeat deficiencies as well as recent serious deficiencies (Levels F and H and above); and · Information from the State ombudsman. The regulation states that good faith attempts by the committee to identify and correct quality deficiencies will not be used as a basis for sanctions. The facility is not required to release the records of the QAA committee to the surveyors to review, and the facility is not required to disclose records of the QAA committee beyond those that demonstrate compliance with the regulation (F520). However the facility may choose such disclosure if it is the facility’s only means of showing the composition and functioning of the QAA committee. If the facility has provided the records for surveyor review, this information may not be used to cite deficiencies unrelated to the QAA committee requirement. It is recommended that surveyors not review QAA records (if provided) until after they complete their investigations of other tags. If the survey team’s review of the QAA committee records reveals that the committee is making good faith efforts to identify quality deficiencies and to develop action plans to correct quality deficiencies, this requirement (F520) should not be cited. However, if the survey team had already independently (not through use of the records) identified noncompliance in the same areas as those that have been selected by the QAA committee, the team is expected to cite the noncompliance for the other requirements. Throughout the survey, the survey team may become aware of other concerns regarding the delivery of care and services that may reflect that the QAA committee is not functioning in identifying ongoing and current quality deficiencies. During the daily meetings, the team discusses concerns about facility compliance that they are identifying through observations, interviews, and record reviews. The information from the entrance conference about the composition and meetings of the QAA committee is reviewed and relayed to the team. The team coordinator assigns a surveyor to obtain information from the person the facility has designated as responsible for the QAA committee. The surveyor should interview this designated person to determine: · How the committee identifies current and ongoing issues for committee action. This could include how they monitor the provision of care and services on an ongoing basis, and how they ascertain from residents and/or their families information regarding the facility’s provision of care and services, in addition to facility staff throughout the various departments, and outside consultants and/or suppliers and providers of care; · The methods the committee uses to develop action plans; and · How current action plans are being implemented, including: staff training; deployment of changes to procedures; monitoring and feedback mechanisms that have been established; and, for any plans that are not achieving or sustaining desired outcomes to correct the deficiencies, the process underway for revision to these plans. The assigned surveyor should interview staff in various departments to determine if they know how to bring an issue to the attention of the QAA committee. If, during the course of the survey, the survey team identifies noncompliance at a particular requirement, the assigned surveyor should interview the designated person responsible for the QAA committee to determine whether the committee knew of or should have known of the issues related to the noncompliance. The assigned surveyor should determine if the committee had considered the quality deficiency and if it was determined that an action plan was needed. If so, the surveyor determines whether the committee developed and implemented any action plans to address these concerns. The survey team should verify that the action plans that are described are actually implemented, and that staff are providing care and services according to the directives of these action plans. Synopsis of Regulation (F520) This requirement has two aspects: the facility must have a committee composed of certain key members that meets at least quarterly (or more often, as necessary); and the committee functions to develop and implement appropriate plans of actions to correct identified quality deficiencies. Criteria for Compliance The facility is in compliance if: · It has a functioning QAA committee, consisting of the director of nursing, a physician, and at least three other staff members, that meets at least quarterly; and · The committee: o Identifies quality deficiencies; and o Develops and implements appropriate plans of actions. If not, cite F520. Noncompliance for F520 After completing the investigative protocol, the survey team determines whether or not compliance with the regulation exists. Examples of noncompliance may include, but are not limited to, the following: · Lack of a physician member of the committee; · The committee met only twice during the previous year; · The action plan to correct a quality deficiency regarding food temperatures was not being followed by staff in the dietary department, and food was not being served at proper temperatures; or · An action plan was developed to correct a problem with inadequate assessment of root causes of falls. Staff did not implement the plan, and residents continued to experience serious falls. · An action plan that was developed to correct the issue of resident falls did not take account of the root cause of the falls being overuse of sedative type medications. The plan was to increase the use of restraints which was an inappropriate action plan. More information on Quality Assurance regulations can be found in the book: D.O.N.'s Handbook for Long Term Care
|
![]()
Long Term Care Solutions
Phone: 877-881-2404
www.LTCSBooks.com